McWow the Awesome

This post is so incredibly spot-on it hurts.

There are really two types of files. There are files that are private and there are files you don't care about. No one wants to save their company's word and excel docs in a vague cloud you're not quite sure you'll ever get the files back from because of the security concerns. Not to mention people won't understand what happened. Where did the file go? I don't see it? Oh no my file is gone! How do I get it back? I have to search? Why isn't it on the computer? etc.

The other files are.. well.. just random stuff. They're photos of your summer vacation, photos that are already on facebook and flickr because you wanted to share them. They're mp3s you bought *cough*, but those are already synced between your computer and your ipod and maybe you've even moved past files and use something like deezer or, if you're american, pandora to get your music fill.

And what other media do you really want? Most of it is probably on youtube unless it's a full movie or tv episode in which case you can probably get it off a torrent or an flv streaming site. Soon enough (if the stupid media industry ever wakes up) it'll be cheaply available on-demand.

So what's really left to back up? I'm an outlying case because I have source code files I want to keep but even then I have a subversion server running on my pc and I can check my code into google code (or sourceforge if you prefer or any hosted service if you prefer to keep your code closed source) whenever I want.

I think Joel makes a very compelling point that it's a service we just don't need. It's something we will hopefully very soon be taking for granted. Something every developer will have to deal with if they expect their app to get any sort of market traction. The app will have to work on the web, on the phone, offline, etc. If it doesn't people will instead scratch their head and go for another that's maybe not as good but provides what people will by then consider basic features. An actual service to do this for consumers just won't work.

Of course it's really only partly aimed at consumers. It's mostly aimed at developers. I suppose it's another try to control the API developers mainly write code with but it's not going to work. No one trusts Microsoft. While some people might have their reservations and go ahead anyway because they consider the platform to be better, it certainly won't be the majority. The vast majority will say no thanks I'll develop my app on my own. Then I'll add in some backend "cloud" features. (Which really isn't hard.) Then I'll make a mobile version that works with my "cloud". Then I'll know my stack up and down and be able to fix any problem that comes up (provided I'm competent enough) and won't be dependent on the good graces of any other company, especially one that has proven itself to, time and time again, have very little grace.

Are negative campaigns effective?

No, this isn't about politics, but it's related.

Political campaigns are well known for slandering the other candidates but it seems Apple is descending to their level more and more. The Mac vs PC commercials were a very good idea but their execution is terrible. Up until recently I was mostly indifferent to the commercials. I don't like negative campaigns (who cares if the other product sucks? I don't want to know why I shouldn't buy their stuff, I want to know why I should buy your stuff) in general but it was fairly mild stuff.

Until this latest one.

Watch this:

Isn't that terrible? It doesn't even make any sense! How the hell did Vista, an operating system, break billing software? After being subjected to that commercial I was actually angry. How is that effective advertising?

What's Google's definition of evil?

I wonder if blatantly copying Campfire is included? Check out HuddleChat, a complete copy of Campfire, right down to the layout. Watch the video on the right of the HuddleChat page then take a look at the screenshots/video page for Campfire.

I know HuddleChat is supposed to be a demo of the Google App Engine and not an actual product but they could've put at least a little effort in and not just ripped of 37 Signals.

On the road to aeronautics

Well, I've been "in the industry" for nearly a year now. And what do people "in the industry" do, really? They write frameworks and white papers of course. I already wrote my own framework, so the next obvious step in my ascension to architecture astronomy was to write a white paper. Which I did. I hope you all enjoy it.

Logic - by Paul Graham

First, you need to read this essay, Paul Graham's latest. Or at least as much of it as you can stomach before you stop.

Go ahead, I'll wait.

Back?

Ok.

See a problem with the article? I'll give you a hint.

Paul Graham is a human.

Paul Graham likes startups.

Therefore, humans like startups.

Given the above, humans not in startups are obviously sub-human.

That was pretty much the article, just not in so many words.

EDIT: Ok, maybe not sub-human, just unhappy.

EDIT2: Paul wrote an explanation of what he was really trying to say in the essay. I guess this was another issue of the missing body language and non-verbal queues causing people like me to get the wrong message.

Good luck Jeff!

I hope the new change works out for the best.

I guess if you follow him on twitter it's not too hard to guess who in that list is the mysterious new partner though. =)

My first philosophical paper

Just wrote it. Now I need to figure out where to submit it for publication.

CS Games was amazing

I was going to write a long post about how awesome CS Games was but Harley did all the work for me.

Case in point

An Open Email About Blogs

Recently, Larry O'Brien was on a talk radio show called unscripted. The topic being discussed was Ottawa mayor Larry O'Brien's plans to start blogging. I missed what Larry said, probably tuning in just a little too late but kept listening anyway. Eventually, someone young called in and said that she got most of her information online and didn't think it was bad that the mayor said he didn't read newspapers. Previously, everyone had said that that was scary. The host ripped into her for quite a while, spouting nonsense like do you really want everything unfiltered? Do you want an unfiltered fireman response? Or an unfiltered police response? (What those questions are supposed to mean I don't quite know.) He said that blogs were useless vanity enhancers, just there to boost one's ego.

I tried calling in several times after that but it always said that they weren't accepting calls at that time and eventually the show ended. So instead I wrote an email. This email I wrote on Feb 25th and still haven't gotten a reply. I don't expect to ever get one but if I ever do I'll add the response. It's largely inspired by Jeremy Zawodny's blog post here. This is what I wrote:

Hi, I'm interested in your opinion on blogs. I think you may be on the mark for it not being a replacement for serious journalism but a little off the mark as to their overall worth.

I'm a technical person that works with computers so I'm more susceptible to an online medium but that's only because of how terrible newspapers have been at covering the topics that interest me. The newspaper cannot and will not discuss issues I care about at the level I wish to read them. In technical matters not only do they dumb things down beyond the point of (my) interest, they are often completely wrong. Sometimes this is a result of the difficulty of explaining technical concepts to a non-technical audience but fairly often it's factually incorrect. I've had to explain to friends and family members many times that the technical article they read in the newspaper was just plain wrong. If they're getting what I know about wrong, how can I trust them with what I don't know about?

And that's why I prefer blogs. The majority of blogs are just an exercise in writing for the person that writes it but there are many blogs written by the foremost experts in a vast number of narrow domains. This makes the information written in them incredibly useful and often very insightful. Newspapers generally cover their "bread and butter" topics such as politics and daily events better than blogs but there's no way for them to compete in the extremely long tail of interesting topics that are outside their regular domain. There's no way newspapers can compete with Bruce Schneier on information security or with Seth Godin on marketing since the scope of their discussion is too narrow and therefore not of general interest (but still of excellent quality).

It's also an issue of trust. I'd like you to read this

(A blog, I know but very much on topic for this discussion.)

Eventually he concludes:

But do you see the irony here? The study making this claim was constructed and published in a way that resists all efforts to evaluate its relevance, accuracy, or authority. Which hardly matters, since none of the reporting about the study seems to have made any such effort.

Pioneering research shows 'Google Generation' is a myth? So far as I can see, that report says more about the researchers who wrote it, and about the reporters who reacted to it, than it says about any real or imaginary trends.

I think this comes about because they've never had anyone check up on them before. The difference between the pain barrier of reading a newspaper article, then heading to the library to check the claims and vague references (which would have been necessary just 15 years ago) and reading an article online and doing a google search to get more information from many more sources is massive. Articles like those are why more and more of the younger generation are being turned off of traditional media.

By the way, to disclose my bias, the reason I was listening to your show this evening was because Larry O'Brien (the Hawaiian Larry) wrote about it on his blog. [Ed. I actually learned about it via twitter but it was written on the blog too]

Thanks for your time,

Guillaume Theoret

Brand New Blog!

I'm proud to introduce my new blog, the engine for which I wrote myself from scratch. For some reason wordpress started displaying everything in reverse order without me changing anything. My old host had been having a lot of difficulty so maybe it was something that happened while they were down but either way I figured I'd take that as my queue to write my own thing.

Writing a minimal blog is ridiculously easy. The longest part was doing the layout (because I suck at graphics). I did the whole layout myself too. =)

Let me know what you think.

Oh and if you're interested in the source you can get the full blog source here and a somewhat out of date version (I'll commit all the changes I made to the framework for SmokinnBlog soon) of the bare bones framework here.

The one thing I'm proud of (everything else is pretty simple) you'll notice if you try to comment. I got the idea for that kind of spam filtering from here. I still need to make a simple search box though. I used to use that pretty often.

If you run across any bugs you can let me know in the comments or by dropping me an email.

To give you an idea of what the overall blog structure is like, here's a tree view of the source:

(You can click for biggerization)

Also, you'll have to update your rss feeds. There's a link to the new feed on the right or you can just right click here. Sorry about that, I know updating feeds is annoying but I don't have a choice, I'm going to be dropping my other host in a month.

EDIT: Fixed IE bugs.